Strength progression
Next week's weights, decided.
Opportunity score
4,164 / 10k
Niche, but buildable. Small audience, low noise.
Rank
#123
Gap
C
Demand
25
2,260 contestable searches a month across 25 related keywords.
Momentum
94
Last three months ran up 53.3% against the three before, seasonality smoothed out.
Competition gap
23
25 real products rank on page one for this, ad competition 0.00.
Crowd
46
6 head-to-head rankings from builders, counted at partial weight until 20.
Willingness to pay
n/a
No ad pricing on this keyword, so there's no read on whether money moves here.
What this score is based on
evidence checked 9/30/2026
- Search demand verified against Google Ads data
- 12 months of search history
- 25 related keywords clustered
- 3 firsthand pain signals from forum threads
- 25 competitors analyzed from page-one results
- 6 crowd rankings from builders
Search demand comes from Google Ads data via DataForSEO and refreshes daily. Competitors come from a live scan of page-one results. Crowd input comes from builders ranking ideas 1-2-3 on the market.
Keyword cluster
25 keywords · 2,260 searches a month combined
Demand counts the whole cluster: 2,260 searches a month across every relevant way people look for this problem. The intent label on each keyword tells you how close that searcher is to wanting software.
| Keyword | Intent | Searches | CPC | Ad comp. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| greyskull linear progression | unclear | 880 | $5.19 | 0.01 |
| squat progression | unclear | 390 | - | 0.01 |
| one leg squat progression | unclear | 170 | $0.06 | 0.06 |
| pullup progression program | wants a tool | 140 | $0.31 | 0.04 |
| weightlifting progression | unclear | 70 | - | 0.00 |
| pistol squats progression | unclear | 70 | - | 0.13 |
| progression weight training | unclear | 50 | $2.20 | 0.04 |
| pullup progression | unclear | 50 | $0.14 | 0.06 |
| pullups progression | unclear | 50 | - | 0.01 |
| starting strength progression | unclear | 50 | - | 0.00 |
| strength training progression | unclear | 50 | - | 0.00 |
| strength progression | unclear | 50 | - | 0.00 |
| linear progression weightlifting | unclear | 30 | - | 0.03 |
| starting strength linear progression | unclear | 30 | - | 0.00 |
| goblet squat progression | unclear | 30 | - | 0.00 |
| barbell squat progression | unclear | 20 | - | 0.03 |
| farmers carry progression | unclear | 20 | - | 0.04 |
| linear progression workout | unclear | 20 | - | 0.00 |
| weighted pullup progression | unclear | 20 | - | 0.02 |
| back squat progression | unclear | 20 | - | 0.02 |
| core strength progression | unclear | 10 | - | 0.00 |
| core workout progression | unclear | 10 | - | 0.00 |
| dumbbell curl progression | unclear | 10 | - | 0.00 |
| greyskull lp progression | unclear | 10 | - | 0.00 |
| atg squat progression | unclear | 10 | - | 0.00 |
CPC is what an advertiser pays Google for one click on that phrase — a rough price tag on how valuable the visitor is. Ad comp. runs 0 to 1 and is how full the ad auction is: near 1 means advertisers are fighting over it (money is there, but ranking is hard), near 0 means almost nobody bids.
Who has the problem
Trainees struggle to consistently apply specific linear progression methods for various exercises, with searches like 'greyskull linear progression' (880/mo) indicating a need for structured guidance. They are left manually figuring out the precise next steps for weight increases or exercise variations across different lifts.
- Who experiences it
- A person following a strength training program like Greyskull LP or Starting Strength.
- When it happens
- When planning their next workout session, they need to determine the specific weights or variations for exercises like squats, pull-ups, or dumbbell curls.
- How often
- This occurs weekly as they prepare for new training cycles.
- What they do today
- The current tool for tracking and planning seems to be insufficient, leading to searches for 'squat progression', 'pullup progression program', or 'linear progression workout'.
Read off 25 search phrases and 3 forum threads listed below, 9/24/2026.
Why now
Demand is climbing and the field hasn't consolidated.
Searches are up 134% year over year
29 a month twelve months ago → 68 now for "strength progression".
Rising 53% over the last quarter
Last three months of searches against the three before them.
Peaks in November
Demand swings 134% across the year, so ship roughly two months before November.
3 real products on page one
Alongside 21 articles and reference pages, which is room a focused tool can take.
6 builder rankings back it
Crowd rating 1514 Elo from head-to-head votes on the market.
Search data
verified · dataforseo:us · refreshed 9/30/2026
- Lead keyword
- strength progression
- Cluster volume
- 2,260 / mo
- across 25 related keywords; lead phrase is 50 / mo
- CPC
- -
- what an advertiser pays for one click here
- Ad competition
- 0.00
- 0-1 scale: barely any advertisers bidding
Opportunity score 4,164 = 40% contestable search demand (2,260 a month across 25 keywords) + 25% how open the competition still is (25 products on page one) + 15% momentum (last three months vs the three before, capped so one bucketed month can't swing it) + 10% willingness to pay (no ad pricing) + 10% crowd rankings (Elo 1514, 6 head-to-heads, weighted by how many votes exist). Anything we can't measure is dropped and the rest re-weighted, so a blank signal never counts as an average one. Search data refreshes daily from Google Ads via DataForSEO.
Monthly searches for "strength progression"
6 votes · demand from dataforseo:us, updated 9/30/2026
Peak 68 · latest 68 · low 29 searches a month
Google reports monthly volume in fixed buckets (…27,100 · 33,100 · 40,500 · 49,500), so steady months land on the exact same number. Weekly data isn't published.
This chart tracks the single lead phrase. The demand score uses the whole cluster of 25 related phrases (2,260 searches a month), listed below.
Revenue potential
estimate, not a promise
Priced and converted as a prosumer subscription — the funnel below changes with that model, because a freemium consumer app and a B2B tool convert nothing alike.
MRR by month 12
$36 – $215
4–24 paying users · +0–3 new a month at 5% churn
Year-one run rate
$431 – $2,585
the month-12 number annualised — you earn less than this during the ramp
Price
$9/mo
same price as the business model below
24-month projection
log scale
Month 24 · hover to scrub
The two solid lines are the range above: a slow build and good execution on a slice of this demand. The dashed line is the breakout — you become the default answer for this problem, take roughly a quarter of the intent, convert far better because people arrive already sold, and churn halves. That's the outcome worth chasing, and it's about $3,920 a month by month 24 (1,085 paying users). Most ideas land on the bottom line; the point of the chart is that the ceiling isn't the estimate.
How we got there
- 2,260 cluster searches a month, 1.6x for app stores and word of mouth.
- You reach 1.0-6.0% of that, scaled by ad competition 0.00.
- 10% of visitors sign up, 12% of those pay. Trial-led: people arrive already shopping, so trial-to-paid runs high.
- That wins 0-3 new subscribers a month. Stack 12 months of that against 5% monthly churn and you're holding 4-24 paying users by month 12.
- Price $9/mo, taken from the business model below.
Who already builds this
3 real products · 21 articles, explainers and store pages · 6 read in depth · scanned daily on Google for "strength progression"
3 real products own this search. Everything else on page one is a roundup, review post or explainer, listed separately below.
Ranks #2 on Google for "strength progression".
Pricing Try for free
Strengths Provides a clear, singular tool for calculating training progress.
Weaknesses Limited to a single function; no mention of broader features, tracking, or platform integration.
~21,763 organic visits a month (estimate)
peakstrength.app · from live Google results · verified Aug 18
source pageRanks #6 on Google for "greyskull linear progression".
~30,938 organic visits a month (estimate)
boostcamp.app · from live Google results · verified Aug 18
- #9Hardy
Ranks #9 on Google for "greyskull linear progression".
~1,088 organic visits a month (estimate)
hardy.app · from live Google results · verified Aug 18
Also ranking, but not products (21)
Roundups, review posts, explainers and store pages. They compete for the search, not for the job — they don't count against the competition gap.
- #1ReferenceComplexity: A Novel Load Progression Strategy in Strength ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- #1UnclassifiedGreySkull LP Isn't Good, It's Greatpowerliftingtowin.com
- #3UnclassifiedGreySkull LP: Is It Good for Gaining Muscle Mass?outlift.com
- #3UnclassifiedStrength Training Progression Methodschrisadamspersonaltraining.com
- #4UnclassifiedStarting Strength Training Programsstartingstrength.com
- #4UnclassifiedGreySkull LP Program Spreadsheet - GSLP (2026)liftvault.com
- #5UnclassifiedPhrak's Greyskull LP Workout Programliftosaur.com
- #6UnclassifiedGuidelines to progress your physical training over timemycg.uscg.mil
- #7ArticleThe Art of Lifting Heavier: A Guide to Gradual Progression ...westcoaststrength.com
- #7UnclassifiedGreySkullLP as base for Powerbuilding | The Forumstrongfirst.com
- #9UnclassifiedProgression Models for Strength: Selection Process - T-Nationt-nation.com
- #10UnclassifiedSuper Strength: 8 Week Strength Building Workout for ...muscleandstrength.com
- #10ArticleThe Greyskull LP Workout: Routine Tips + Spreadsheetsteelsupplements.com
- #11ArticleHow Long Should Strength Gains Take? 4 Weeks Vs. 12 ...fitbod.me
- #12UnclassifiedPhraks greyskull linear progressionproximafitness.com
- #12UnclassifiedProgressive Overload in Strength Training: The Principle of ...smithperformancecenter.com
- #13Unclassified#252 - Getting Started #6: Linear Progression - The Simple ...barbell-logic.com
- #13UnclassifiedPhraks Greyskull LPjefit.com
- #14UnclassifiedProgramming for Strength: EVERYTHING You Need to Knowempire-barbell.com
- #14UnclassifiedThe Greyskull Methods- A Primer | Health/Fitnesstigerdroppings.com
- #15ArticleWhat is Progressive Overload? A Beginner's Guideplanetfitness.com
Likely business model
willingness to pay 32/100
Prosumer subscription
People are actively shopping for a tool here, so charge from day one.
How rivals make money 4 competitors read: 1 on subscriptions, 0 one-time, 0 free. Plans seen: Try for free
Price to test · from ad click value
$4–$14/mo
No competitor pricing page was readable across the 4 we checked, so this band comes from what a click on this intent costs advertisers ($0.00) — a starting price to test, not a proven one.
What to charge for
Trial then subscribe. This crowd is already comparing paid tools, so ask for the card early rather than running a wide free tier.
What this data can't tell you
- · Nobody's published price backs this band yet — treat the number as a test, and put a price up in week one to find out.
Willingness-to-pay evidence
- 4 competitors read: 1 on subscriptions, 0 one-time, 0 free. Plans seen: Try for free
- 100% of the 25-keyword cluster is commercial-intent wording (best, app, pricing, alternative).
- Ad competition 0.00 — few advertisers fighting for it.
Firsthand pain signals
3 discussions · source links, check them yourself
- r/heroesofthestorm
r/heroesofthestorm: Reddit community for Blizzard's MOBA game - Heroes of the Storm.
reddit.com
- r/stalker
r/stalker: All about the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. survival-horror computer game series: Shadow of Chernobyl, Clear Sky, Call of Pripyat, community mods for…
reddit.com
- r/NoMansSkyTheGame
r/NoMansSkyTheGame: The unofficial subreddit for the discussion of No Man's Sky. A fantasy science-fiction game set in an infinite…
reddit.com